North Carolina Federal Marijuana Probable Cause Seizure Lawyers Attorneys

North Carolina Federal Marijuana Probable Cause Seizure Lawyers Attorneys

by

Atchuthan Sriskandarajah

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STAHLE LINN, III, Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

June 10, 1994, Argued

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsaDxgInXNY[/youtube]

August 3, 1994, Decided

Facts:

Stahle Linn, III was indicted for possession of marijuana with the intent to distribute. After his motion to suppress was denied by the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, defendant entered a conditional guilty plea to possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C.S. 841(1)(a). He now appeals the denial of his motion to suppress, arguing that when law enforcement officers seized him they lacked probable cause to search his airplane, vehicle, or any of his personal belongings.

Issue:

Whether the trial court erred in denying defendant s

motion to suppress

because officers lacked probable cause to conduct the challenged searches?

Discussion

The Court held that though officers had an arrest warrant with them, because they had not executed it at the time of the search, it could not be used to support the search. The automobile exception was not applicable because the totality of the circumstances failed to show probable cause for the search. In declaring that probable cause was missing, the court noted that the majority of facts relied on by the government in its claim of probable cause concerned criminal history that was over 15 years old and, thus, of no relevance to the probable cause determination. suppression motion. Accordingly the court reversed the judgment of the lower court, which had convicted defendant of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. The case was remanded to the lower court for further proceedings.

Disclaimer:These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm s unofficial views of the Justices opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content

Atchuthan Sriskandarajah is a Virginia lawyer and owner of the SRIS Law Group. The SRIS Law Group has offices in Virginia, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York,

North Carolina

& California. The firm handles criminal/traffic defense, family law, immigration & bankruptcy cases.

Article Source:

ArticleRich.com

Real Legal Apps For Real Lawyers

Submitted by: Jared D. Irving

Technology is very pervasive and has shown proof of its ability to transcend all kinds of activities, industries, workplaces, and careers. Even what used to be an office cluttered with books, paper and typewriter, which can be associated with the legal profession, is not immune to the advances in technology. Hence, throughout the years legal apps for lawyers have become common gadgets in effectively executing their sworn services as legal counsel to their trusting clients.

The internet has made possible the proliferation of modern workplace tools and, more particularly, lawyer apps through which people who are even miles or continents away from each other may clearly exchange communication related to their business. As the legal practice is heavily dependent on a sound client-attorney relationship, clear lines of communication is indispensable. Modern legal practitioners have made themselves comfortable with useful apps for lawyers that allow them to get in touch with their clients and prospects easier and faster.

There are unfortunate times when lawyers cannot simply attend to all pressing matters on his folio due to simultaneous deadlines and schedule of activities. However, the lawyer is nonetheless expected do the impossible mission of handling each case without any delay. With the latest legal apps, legal practitioners can exactly do those seemingly impossible tasks within such small window of time. There are times when lawyers are finding it easy to manage their responsibilities even when time and space limitations will not simply allow it. You can find some websites designed to help lawyers become comfortable with technology solutions are regularly featuring easy and affordable gadgets and software applications that can literally multiply their visibility and ability over time.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqxaQlA_Ecw[/youtube]

Even when on the field, meeting a client, or sitting down on a negotiation table, lawyers can transmit the all-important set of documents to another client without a fuss by availing of apps for lawyers. Decades ago, bulky templates of legal documents were just too ludicrous for a lawyer to be carrying them in a bag as they go around town. Using apps for lawyers, all these templates have become bits and bytes stored in a sweet little storage devices like flash drives, MP4 players, eBook readers, netbooks and other portable gadgets that accompany any techie lawyer out there.

Even time spent in preparing the lawyer s various documents have drastically been reduced due to some practical legal apps. There are some lawyer apps that can store and insert uniform and commonly used legal phrases, notes and comments that are the same across several memoranda under a certain category. With a few keyboard strokes using the lawyer apps, the document can be encoded and printed immediately and allow the lawyers to always beat the cut-off filing time.

The sphere of legal practice has been improved very well by technology for the greater benefit of the client, the firm and the lawyer. Nonetheless, no amount of technology can ever make a lawyer obsolete but a lawyer who does not make use of technology may become one eventually.

About the Author: Are you looking for more information regarding

legal apps

? Visit

ilawyerapps.com/

today!

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=761604&ca=Legal