Cleveland, Ohio clinic performs US’s first face transplant

Thursday, December 18, 2008

A team of eight transplant surgeons in Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, USA, led by reconstructive surgeon Dr. Maria Siemionow, age 58, have successfully performed the first almost total face transplant in the US, and the fourth globally, on a woman so horribly disfigured due to trauma, that cost her an eye. Two weeks ago Dr. Siemionow, in a 23-hour marathon surgery, replaced 80 percent of her face, by transplanting or grafting bone, nerve, blood vessels, muscles and skin harvested from a female donor’s cadaver.

The Clinic surgeons, in Wednesday’s news conference, described the details of the transplant but upon request, the team did not publish her name, age and cause of injury nor the donor’s identity. The patient’s family desired the reason for her transplant to remain confidential. The Los Angeles Times reported that the patient “had no upper jaw, nose, cheeks or lower eyelids and was unable to eat, talk, smile, smell or breathe on her own.” The clinic’s dermatology and plastic surgery chair, Francis Papay, described the nine hours phase of the procedure: “We transferred the skin, all the facial muscles in the upper face and mid-face, the upper lip, all of the nose, most of the sinuses around the nose, the upper jaw including the teeth, the facial nerve.” Thereafter, another team spent three hours sewing the woman’s blood vessels to that of the donor’s face to restore blood circulation, making the graft a success.

The New York Times reported that “three partial face transplants have been performed since 2005, two in France and one in China, all using facial tissue from a dead donor with permission from their families.” “Only the forehead, upper eyelids, lower lip, lower teeth and jaw are hers, the rest of her face comes from a cadaver; she could not eat on her own or breathe without a hole in her windpipe. About 77 square inches of tissue were transplanted from the donor,” it further described the details of the medical marvel. The patient, however, must take lifetime immunosuppressive drugs, also called antirejection drugs, which do not guarantee success. The transplant team said that in case of failure, it would replace the part with a skin graft taken from her own body.

Dr. Bohdan Pomahac, a Brigham and Women’s Hospital surgeon praised the recent medical development. “There are patients who can benefit tremendously from this. It’s great that it happened,” he said.

Leading bioethicist Arthur Caplan of the University of Pennsylvania withheld judgment on the Cleveland transplant amid grave concerns on the post-operation results. “The biggest ethical problem is dealing with failure — if your face rejects. It would be a living hell. If your face is falling off and you can’t eat and you can’t breathe and you’re suffering in a terrible manner that can’t be reversed, you need to put on the table assistance in dying. There are patients who can benefit tremendously from this. It’s great that it happened,” he said.

Dr Alex Clarke, of the Royal Free Hospital had praised the Clinic for its contribution to medicine. “It is a real step forward for people who have severe disfigurement and this operation has been done by a team who have really prepared and worked towards this for a number of years. These transplants have proven that the technical difficulties can be overcome and psychologically the patients are doing well. They have all have reacted positively and have begun to do things they were not able to before. All the things people thought were barriers to this kind of operations have been overcome,” she said.

The first partial face transplant surgery on a living human was performed on Isabelle Dinoire on November 27 2005, when she was 38, by Professor Bernard Devauchelle, assisted by Professor Jean-Michel Dubernard in Amiens, France. Her Labrador dog mauled her in May 2005. A triangle of face tissue including the nose and mouth was taken from a brain-dead female donor and grafted onto the patient. Scientists elsewhere have performed scalp and ear transplants. However, the claim is the first for a mouth and nose transplant. Experts say the mouth and nose are the most difficult parts of the face to transplant.

In 2004, the same Cleveland Clinic, became the first institution to approve this surgery and test it on cadavers. In October 2006, surgeon Peter Butler at London‘s Royal Free Hospital in the UK was given permission by the NHS ethics board to carry out a full face transplant. His team will select four adult patients (children cannot be selected due to concerns over consent), with operations being carried out at six month intervals. In March 2008, the treatment of 30-year-old neurofibromatosis victim Pascal Coler of France ended after having received what his doctors call the worlds first successful full face transplant.

Ethical concerns, psychological impact, problems relating to immunosuppression and consequences of technical failure have prevented teams from performing face transplant operations in the past, even though it has been technically possible to carry out such procedures for years.

Mr Iain Hutchison, of Barts and the London Hospital, warned of several problems with face transplants, such as blood vessels in the donated tissue clotting and immunosuppressants failing or increasing the patient’s risk of cancer. He also pointed out ethical issues with the fact that the procedure requires a “beating heart donor”. The transplant is carried out while the donor is brain dead, but still alive by use of a ventilator.

According to Stephen Wigmore, chair of British Transplantation Society’s ethics committee, it is unknown to what extent facial expressions will function in the long term. He said that it is not certain whether a patient could be left worse off in the case of a face transplant failing.

Mr Michael Earley, a member of the Royal College of Surgeon‘s facial transplantation working party, commented that if successful, the transplant would be “a major breakthrough in facial reconstruction” and “a major step forward for the facially disfigured.”

In Wednesday’s conference, Siemionow said “we know that there are so many patients there in their homes where they are hiding from society because they are afraid to walk to the grocery stores, they are afraid to go the the street.” “Our patient was called names and was humiliated. We very much hope that for this very special group of patients there is a hope that someday they will be able to go comfortably from their houses and enjoy the things we take for granted,” she added.

In response to the medical breakthrough, a British medical group led by Royal Free Hospital’s lead surgeon Dr Peter Butler, said they will finish the world’s first full face transplant within a year. “We hope to make an announcement about a full-face operation in the next 12 months. This latest operation shows how facial transplantation can help a particular group of the most severely facially injured people. These are people who would otherwise live a terrible twilight life, shut away from public gaze,” he said.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Cleveland,_Ohio_clinic_performs_US%27s_first_face_transplant&oldid=4528710”

Category:April 16, 2010

? April 15, 2010
April 17, 2010 ?
April 16

Pages in category “April 16, 2010”

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Category:April_16,_2010&oldid=2987667”

Importance Of Choosing A Good Mommy Makeover Plastic Surgeon}

Submitted by: Kyoung Kim

Cosmetic surgery is the best known type of plastic surgery that involves surgical and medical techniques for improving ones appearance, especially maintaining, enhancing or restoring normal appearance. Some of the most popular cosmetic procedures are abdominoplasty, mammoplasty, buttock augmentation, lip enhancement, liposuction, chin augmentation, cheek augmentation, etc. If you are considering a mammoplasty or any other type of cosmetic surgery, then what you need to understand is that, it is a medical procedure and you should consult only highly qualified, skilled and an expert Mommy Makeover Plastic Surgeon for a safe procedure and better results.

Why Mommy Makeover Plastic Surgery?

The birth of a child not only brings immense joy but along with it comes physical and mental changes. The major changes being in your body, post delivery. Diet and exercise may not be enough to restore your body to its pre-pregnancy state and hence you will have to consult a good breast augmentation surgeon who will provide you the best Mommy Makeover Plastic Surgery and help you in restoring your appearance. The treatment focuses on important areas of concern and will generally comprise of a combination of procedures such as tummy tuck and breast augmentation to give you a more fit body. Choosing Mommy Makeover Plastic Surgery will not only return your bodys natural figure, but it will also boost your self-esteem and confidence.

Important Considerations:

Although the decision to go in for mammoplasty will be completely yours, there are several factors to consider, and only a good Mommy Makeover Plastic Surgeon will help you determine what you may need, based on what you are trying to achieve through the surgery.The most important factors to consider are

Type of procedure such as reduction, lift or revision

Size

Scarring

Ability to breast feed

Duration of surgery

Healing process and duration

Cost

Choosing the Best Mommy Makeover Plastic Surgeon:

Just like any other surgery, mammoplasty too comes with some minimal risks. However, the most common risk would be as a result of the surgeons error that could lead to infection or bleeding. Therefore, it is very important for you to be very careful while choosing a Mommy Makeover Plastic Surgeon. You should always seek qualified surgeons who are experts in the field and who have many years of experience. You could either ask for referrals or consult a couple of best surgeons before you choose the right one. A good surgeon should be able to discuss with you openly and clearly all matters related to your breast augmentation procedures and techniques and offer you the best options. Cosmetic surgeons qualified to conduct breast augmentation procedures generally provide consultation for a fee and once you choose to use their services, the Mommy Makeover Plastic Surgery will be carried out either on an outpatient basis or inpatient basis depending upon the procedure and your medical condition.

Just like any other surgery, mammoplasty too comes with some minimal risks. However, the most common risk would be as a result of the surgeons error that could lead to infection or bleeding. Therefore, it is very important for you to be very careful while choosing a Mommy Makeover Plastic Surgeon. You should always seek qualified surgeons who are experts in the field and who have many years of experience. You could either ask for referrals or consult a couple of best surgeons before you choose the right one. A good surgeon should be able to discuss with you openly and clearly all matters related to your breast augmentation procedures and techniques and offer you the best options. Cosmetic surgeons qualified to conduct breast augmentation procedures generally provide consultation for a fee and once you choose to use their services, the Mommy Makeover Plastic Surgery will be carried out either on an outpatient basis or inpatient basis depending upon the procedure and your medical condition.

About the Author: Dr. K. Charles Kim is a Board Certified Plastic Surgeon practicing in Beverly Hills and Orange County, California who specializes in cosmetic surgery of the Liposuction Orange County & Abdominoplasty Beverly Hills. For more kindly visit: –

kcharleskim.com

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=1415548&ca=Medicines+and+Remedies}

Category:Education

This is the category for Education.

Refresh this list to see the latest articles.

  • 6 May 2019: Students compete in second international Neurosurgery Olympiad in Tyumen, Russia
  • 30 April 2019: Wikinews attends Maker Faire in Tyler, Texas
  • 23 June 2018: Algeria blocks internet across nation to prevent cheating in diploma exams
  • 19 May 2018: Principal, teacher arrested for allegedly whipping two students late for school in Ayetoro, Nigeria
  • 25 April 2018: India: Jammu and Kashmir government orders private tuitions to shut down for 90 days
  • 26 January 2018: United States: Two dead in Kentucky high school shooting
  • 20 October 2017: Arrangement of light receptors in the eye may cause dyslexia, scientists say
  • 21 January 2016: Detroit teachers stage sickout to protest working conditions as Obama visits
  • 28 October 2015: Time magazine names Ahmed Mohamed to ‘Most Influential Teens of 2015’
  • 23 October 2015: Masked man kills two in sword attack at Swedish school
?Category:Education

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write.


Sister projects
  • Wikibooks
  • Commons
  • Wikidata
  • Wikipedia
  • Wikiquote
  • Wikisource
  • Wiktionary
  • Wikiversity

Subcategories

Pages in category “Education”

(previous page) ()(previous page) ()

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Education&oldid=4458237”

US dog attack owner charged with involuntary manslaughter

Friday, March 25, 2005A Spotsylvania County woman, whose three dogs allegedly attacked and killed her elderly neighbor, was freed Wednesday by posting a $10,000 bond. Dianna Large, 36, received one felony charge of involuntary manslaughter and three misdemeanor charges in an indictment issued last week.

In her first appearance before a judge, she answered Circuit Court Judge William H. Ledbetter questions with simple “Yes sir.” and “No sir.” responses. The short hearing, held Thursday, formalized the charges against her. The involuntary manslaughter charge, a first in the severity of punishment being sought on a dog owner in the Virginan state of USA, carries a maximum penalty of 10 years.

State procecutor Wiliam Neely said that Large knowingly let her three Pit Bull dogs run free, and that an animal control agency person had warned her to keep them under better control. She also a violated a county ordinance requiring owners of dangerous dogs to post a warning sign to visitors. The prosecution also noted that none of the three male dogs were neutered.

The Animal Control Department of Virginia maintains a dangerous dog registry. It contains a list of owners whose dogs are deemed dangerous to society. The link to the registry was moved to a more prominent position on the county web page following the attack.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=US_dog_attack_owner_charged_with_involuntary_manslaughter&oldid=440549”

North Korean weapons seized in Thailand

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Thai customs officials said today that they had intercepted a North Korean cargo plane loaded with 35 tons (31 Mg) of “heavy weapons”. The Ilyushin Il-76 aircraft, registered in Belarus, was stopped at Bangkok’s Don Muang airport, after a tip from the U.S. Government. The crew of four North Korean nationals (who have dual citizenship with Kazakhstan) and one Belarusian were arrested on site.

Thai PM Abhisit Vejjajiva said to The Times: “They committed two crimes: firstly they gave false information about their cargo, and secondly that cargo was found to be weapons”. North Korea is banned from exporting or importing weapons under UN Security Council resolution 1874. There is no comment at this time from the North Korean government.

A report from the Xinhua News Agency says that the cargo was en route to Ukraine, while another report from CNN says it was headed to Sri Lanka. The pilot, Belarusian Mikhail Petukhou, told Thai officials after six hours of interrogation that he had no knowledge of the cargo or its origins. He said that he and his crew members would “[only] provide other information in court.”

The North Korea arms ban was first imposed in 2006, and strengthened in June, after North Korea tested ballistic missiles and nuclear devices. North Korea’s annual profit from arms sales is estimated to be US$1 billion (€684m, Thai?3.3t).

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=North_Korean_weapons_seized_in_Thailand&oldid=3310518”

How To Find The Best Fireplace Installation Company

byadmin

Making a choice to install an indoor or outdoor fireplace can substantially raise the property value of your home or establishment while also providing an enjoyable, functional space you can use for decades to come. If you are looking for a quality fireplace installation in West Michigan, consider the following factors when selecting a vendor.

Choose a vendor who is able to provide a wide variety of fireplace options. From wood burning and traditional masonry fireplaces to more specialized installations such as outdoor and alternative fuel fireplaces that utilize corn, coal or pellets as fuel, expert installers with access to a wide variety of vendors and building types are likely to be able to provide quality prices at the most competitive prices.

Find a provider with both online and physical showroom locations. While online only options may feel like the most convenient route, pictures can be deceiving. An attractive, well-designed fireplace may very well become the most memorable and cherished aspect of your home. It is worth doing the extra in-person research to make sure you are making the right choice in your quality fireplace installation in West Michigan. This also gives you the additional opportunity to ask any questions you may have directly to the specialists. In addition, installers who are willing to showcase their products in person are far less likely to be hiding shoddy products behind strategic angles and glossy lighting.

If you are able to visit a showroom, make sure you bring a picture of the space where you would like to have your fireplace installed along with the dimensions of the space. This will allow installation professionals to help you to select the model ideally suited to your space while staying within your budget constraints.

Finding the right quality fireplace installation in West Michigan can mean the difference between an expensive-to-run, lackluster product and the fireplace of your dreams. Work with true professionals, and begin making your fireplace fantasies come to life today. Visit the website http://www.vanderwallbros.com/ for more information.

Bush crashes his bike into Scottish police officer

Thursday, July 7, 2005

U.S. President George W. Bush crashed his mountain bike into an unfortunate police officer in Scotland.

Mr. Bush, who celebrated his 59th birthday last night was cycling on a bike around the Gleneagles Hotel, where he is staying for the 31st G8 summit, when he, perhaps partially due to the bad weather, crashed into one of the police officers responsible for his and the other leaders’ safety.

The officer had to be taken to the hospital having suffered a twisted ankle whilst Mr. Bush, who was wearing a helmet, only suffered minor bruises despite landing on asphalt. The president had to return to the hotel by van because the bike was too badly damaged.

Bush has been involved in two similar accidents during his presidency. In 2003, he fell off a Segway personal transporter, and in 2004, he fell off a mountain bike.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Bush_crashes_his_bike_into_Scottish_police_officer&oldid=417813”

Maryland Judge throws out law banning gay marriages

Saturday, January 21, 2006

Judge M. Brooke Murdock of the Baltimore Circuit Court in Maryland struck down a 1973 law banning same-sex marriage yesterday, ruling the measure violated a state constitutional amendment prohibiting sex discrimination.

The decision will not allow gay couples to be immediately eligible for marriage licenses because Murdock stayed the order pending an appeal. The state’s attorney general’s office filed the appeal right after the ruling was made.

“Although tradition and societal values are important, they cannot be given so much weight that they alone will justify a discriminatory statutory classification,” the judge stated in the ruling. “When tradition is the guise under which prejudice or animosity hides, it is not a legitimate state interest.”

In making the decision, Judge Murdock wrote, “the court is not unaware of the dramatic impact of its ruling.”

Ken Choe, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) Lesbian and Gay Rights Project, said “men and women were indeed treated differently under the law Judge Murdock struck down. A man can marry a woman, but a woman can’t marry a woman. Same-sex couples need the same protections for their families that opposite-sex couples do.”

The ACLU hailed the ruling, calling it “a historical step toward allowing same-sex couples to legally marry in Maryland.” She considered but dismissed all the state’s arguments for the restriction, noting “Prevention of same-sex marriage is not rationally related to the state’s interests in promoting stable families and protecting the best interests of children. … These arguments are illogical and inaccurate.”

Governor Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. released a statement saying that that the state will “begin a vigorous appeals process. I firmly believe the institution of marriage is for one man and one woman only.”

Governor Ehrlich had sent to Attorney General J. Joseph Curran Jr. (D), a letter in response to the ruling advising him to appeal the decision and offered additional resources to support the appeal.

“We have noted an appeal and think it appropriate that the court stayed the operation of its order,” said Kevin J. Enright, a spokesman for Curran, in a statement. “We await having the decision of Maryland’s appellate courts.”

The Maryland House of Delegates scheduled hearings for January 31, 2006 on proposals dealing with same-sex marriages, including a proposed constitutional amendment.

John Lestitian, a plaintiff in the case, said Murdock’s decision was “a step in a very long process. As a 40-year-old man, I should be able to decide who my family is.”

“This is such an exciting moment,” said Lisa Polyak. Her partner of 24 years, Gita Deane, was a plaintiff in the case. “Our participation in this lawsuit has always been about family protections for our children. Tonight, we will rest a little easier knowing that those protections are within reach.”

The equal rights amendment in Maryland’s State Constitution was ratified by voters in 1972. The marriage law which defined marriage as only between one man and one woman was approved the following year.

The lawsuit leading to the decision started when nine gay and/or lesbian couples and one individual sued court clerks in five Maryland counties for denying marriage licenses to them, citing legal, financial, and emotional harm. In July of 2004, the ACLU filed the suit challenging the state ban on same-sex marriage.

Same-sex marriages are only legal in the state of Massachusetts in the United States, with the states of Vermont and Connecticut recognizing other civil unions. Hawaii and New Jersey offer some legal protections to same-sex couples, while 13 states have appoved constitutional amendments rejecting recognition of same-sex marriage. Courts in California, New Jersey, New York and Washington State are facing cases on the issue.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Maryland_Judge_throws_out_law_banning_gay_marriages&oldid=4467361”

Wikinews 2020: An ‘Original reporting’ year in review

Friday, January 1, 2021

After an active year of original content published on the English-language Wikinews, we take a look back at some of the two dozen-plus original reports from our contributors during 2020.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Wikinews_2020:_An_%27Original_reporting%27_year_in_review&oldid=4608262”