US Supreme Court declares same-sex marriage legal

Sunday, June 28, 2015

On Friday, the United States Supreme Court declared same-sex marriage legal in all fifty US states. More than 30 states already permitted gay marriage. The Supreme Court ruled by a five-to-four vote that bans on same-sex marriage were not constitutional. The majority decision was delivered by Justice Anthony Kennedy.

Same-sex marriage was banned in more than a dozen states. Justices Sotomayor, Ginsburg, Kagan, Breyer and Kennedy voted in favour while Justices Roberts, Alito, Scalia and Thomas voted against.

Kennedy’s decision brought tears to the eyes of some lawyers in the courtroom. However, Justice Antonin Scalia in his dissenting opinion derided the majority decision: “The opinion is couched in a style that is as pretentious as its content is egotistic. […] Of course, the opinion’s showy profundities are often profoundly incoherent.”

When the decision was made, police allowed people outside the court to wave the rainbow flag on the court plaza. Demonstrators outside the court chanted “Love has won”. This decision made the United States the 21st country to legalise same-sex marriage.

President Barack Obama responded to the decision: “Today we can say, in no uncertain terms, that we have made our union a little more perfect.”

After this decision, Facebook introduced a new tool to add rainbow coloring to one’s profile picture to celebrate this victory. Mark Zuckerberg posted on Facebook “I’m so happy for all of my friends and everyone in our community who can finally celebrate their love and be recognized as equal couples under the law”.

Later, companies like Google, Yahoo, Tumblr and Vine tweeted with hashtag “#LoveWins”. That night, the White House had the rainbow projected on the outside of the building to celebrate the decision.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=US_Supreme_Court_declares_same-sex_marriage_legal&oldid=4576678”

Rep. Barbara Lee calls for U.S. Congress probe into Iraq War planning

Friday, July 22, 2005

Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), co-chairwoman of the Out of Iraq Caucus and a member of the International Affairs Committee, along with 26 co-sponsors, proposed yesterday a Resolution of Inquiry in the House of Representatives which, if passed, will require the White House and the State Department to“transmit all information relating to communication with officials of the United Kingdom between January 1, 2002, and October 16, 2002, relating to the policy of the United States with respect to Iraq.” The resolution, was submitted in the House of Representatives and referred to the U.S. House Committee on International Relations.

The resolution comes in response to questions that have been raised about the handling of pre-war intelligence by the Bush administration, and the planning and execution of the Iraq war. “We would like to see a member of Congress look into whether or not the president committed impeachable offenses,” said John Bonifaz, a constitutional lawyer. “We’ve been having that discussion with a number of offices.”

Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary Minority leader, recently met with John Bonifaz and representatives. But Conyers is reluctant to take such a bold step just yet. “My inclination at this time is not to do something like that,” Conyers said, although he noted that he wanted to press for an investigation in other ways, including sending committee investigators to London.

Earlier this month, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) said at a forum held by Conyers “If you read the record of the writing of the Constitution, ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’ had a very particular meaning at the time of the drafting of the Constitution. It certainly didn’t mean lying about sex, but it might well mean lying to the Congress about a large public purpose such as Iraq.”, referring to Republican’s filing of such a resolution in 1998 in an effort to remove Bill Clinton from office.

Rep. Barbara Lee’s resolution of inquiry is a less-drastic parliamentary maneuver that would ask the administration to provide more information related to the claims in classified British memos that suggest that pre-war intelligence in Iraq was “fixed” in order to justify the invasion. The Resolution of Inquiry is a privileged resolution, which means that if it is not acted on in 14 legislative days after it is introduced, the member of Congress who introduced it is entitled to request that it be brought to the House floor for a vote. The committee may take the matter up right away, and could vote it down before the August recess. If they do not, they will be required to take it up by September 16th.

RESOLUTION

Requesting the President and directing the Secretary of State to transmit to the House of Representatives not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution all information in the possession of the President and the Secretary of State relating to communication with officials of the United Kingdom between January 1, 2002, and October 16, 2002, relating to thepolicy of the United States with respect to Iraq.

Resolved, That not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution—

(1) the President is requested to transmit to the House of Representatives all documents, including telephone and electronic mail records, logs, calendars, minutes, and memos, in the possession of the President relating to communications with officials of the United Kingdom from January 1, 2002, to October 16, 2002, relating to the policy of the United States with respect to Iraq, including any discussions or communications between the President or other Administration officials and officials of the United Kingdom that occurred before the meeting on July 23, 2002, at 10 Downing Street in London, England, between Prime Minister Tony Blair of the United Kingdom, United Kingdom intelligence officer Richard Dearlove, and other national security officials of the Blair Administration; and

(2) the Secretary of State is directed to transmit to the House of Representatives all documents, including telephone and electronic mail records, logs, calendars, minutes, memos, and records of internal discussions, in the possession of the Secretary relating to communications with officials of the United Kingdom from January 1, 2002, to October 16, 2002, relating to the policy of the United States with respect to Iraq, including any discussions or communications between the Secretary of State or other officials of the Department of State and officials of the United Kingdom that occurred before the meeting on July 23, 2002, at 10 Downing Street in London, England, between Prime Minister Tony Blair of the United Kingdom, United Kingdom intelligence officer Richard Dearlove, and other national security officials of the Blair Administration.

  • Rep. John Conyers
  • Rep. Tammy Baldwin
  • Rep. William Lacy Clay
  • Rep. Danny Davis
  • Rep. William Delahunt
  • Rep. Lane Evans
  • Rep. Sam Farr
  • Rep. Raúl M. Grijalva
  • Rep. Luis Gutierrez
  • Rep. Maurice D. Hinchey
  • Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee
  • Rep. Dennis Kucinich
  • Rep. Carolyn C. Kilpatrick
  • Rep. Jim McDermott
  • Rep. Jim Oberstar
  • Rep. Major R. Owens
  • Rep. Frank Pallone Jr.
  • Rep. Don Payne
  • Rep. Charles Rangel
  • Rep. Jan Schakowsky
  • Rep. José E. Serrano
  • Rep. Pete Stark
  • Rep. Bennie Thompson
  • Rep. Diane Watson
  • Rep. Robert Wexler
  • Rep. Lynn Woolsey
Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Rep._Barbara_Lee_calls_for_U.S._Congress_probe_into_Iraq_War_planning&oldid=4536867”

Candle knocked over during voodoo sex ritual causes apartment fire

Saturday, February 26, 2011

An elderly Brooklyn, New York woman was found dead yesterday after a fire triggered by a voodoo ceremony caused a blaze in an apartment that left dozens homeless. The details of the ceremony were not clear, but sources say it led to sex.

An unidentified woman hired a Voodoo priest for $300, identified as Nelson (Pepe) Pierre, to perform a mystic ceremony meant to bring her good luck. The woman went to Pierre’s apartment, where she ended up in bed surrounded by lit candles which were mistakenly knocked over, setting the bedsheets on fire. In an effort to suppress the flames, Pierre splashed water from the bathroom sink on the sheets while his roommate, who was ironing at the time, opened a window for air. However, according to the New York Fire Department, wind gusting through the open window created a “blowtorch effect” which caused the fire to spread to the 4th floor hallway and into the 5th and 6th floors. The blaze killed one woman, three others were severely injured, and at least 20 firefighters were left with burn wounds.

Time and time again we respond to tragedies that could have been so easily prevented … hopefully others will learn from this tragedy

In an NYFD statement, Fire Commissioner Salvatore J. Cassano said, “Time and time again we respond to tragedies that could have been so easily prevented. This fire had so many of those elements … hopefully others will learn from this tragedy.” It took hours for hundreds of firemen from dozens of companies to bring the raging fire under control.

Pierre, a man in his 60s, did not call 911 right away, but attempted to quell the fire using water from the bathroom sink. A source in law enforcement said, “Nobody sees a crime right now. It was an accident. Maybe they weren’t careful, but they did try to put it out.”

Mary Feagin, a 64-year old retired teacher, died in the blaze.

The New York Police Department is currently investigating the incident.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Candle_knocked_over_during_voodoo_sex_ritual_causes_apartment_fire&oldid=4504146”

Understanding Aircraft Insurance Policies

My Policy Says What?!: Understanding An Aircraft Insurance Policy 2004 Reigel & Associates, Ltd./Aero Legal Services. All rights reserved.Many states require that owners and/or operators of aircraft have insurance covering their aircraft and operations. At a minimum, states usually require third-partyliability coverage. This applies to injuries to third-persons that result from operation of your aircraft. Additionally, if your aircraft is pledged as collateral forfinancing, the lender will require that you have hull coverage and/or replacement value insurance to insure the value of the aircraft collateral.Obtaining the PolicySo, how do you obtain aircraft insurance? Typically, you apply for aircraft insurance through an insurance agent or broker who represents an insurance company orcompanies that provide aircraft insurance policies. The insurance company then reviews the application and does any additional investigation necessary for it toassess its risk in providing you with insurance for your aircraft or operations. Its risk is the likelihood that it may have to pay out on a claim against yourpolicy.In exchange for its acceptance of risk, the insurance company charges you a premium. The amount of that premium is a direct product of the amount of risk that theinsurance company is assuming by extending coverage to your aircraft or operation. The greater the risk, the more expensive the insurance coverage will be. Insome cases, the insurance company may not be willing to accept a particular risk for any price.Factors that affect the underwriting decision include type of aircraft, pilot qualifications (e.g. total time, time in type, pilot certificates/ratings), nature of the operation(e.g. pleasure, business, Part 91 or Part 135) and base of operations. General aviation policies can include non-commercial pleasure and business use under FARPart 91 or commercial use under FAR Part 135.Reading the PolicyWhen an aviation insurance policy is issued, it represents a contract between you and your insurance company. As long as you comply with all of the terms andrequirements of the policy, your insurance company will provide you with coverage. If you fail to comply and a claim arises, you may find yourself withoutcoverage.But, what does the aircraft insurance policy actually say? Well, as a practical matter, it is quite common that pilots and operators do not read their policies. Sure,they may review the declaration page to confirm that the correct parties are named and that the appropriate coverage limits are in place, but often times that is as faras it goes. Sometimes an owner or operator may even ask his or her agent to explain some of the policys terms. Unfortunately, the policy contains quite a bit more information of which the pilot or operator needs to be aware of to ensure that he or she complies with the terms ofthe policy. A thorough review of the policy is both prudent and recommended.This review should begin with the Data Page or Declaration Page. First, confirm that the aircraft is correctly identified and that the appropriate owner and anyadditional insured parties are included. Also read the coverage limits to make sure that you have the limits for which you are paying.Aircraft Damage CoverageThe typical aircraft insurance policy will include both aircraft damage coverage, as well as aircraft liability coverage. The aircraft damage coverage applies whenyour aircraft sustains damage (e.g. bent metal, broken windows etc.). This coverage comes in two flavors: In-flight/In-motion andNot-in-flight/Not-in-motion.As you may have guessed, in the first instance your aircraft will be insured for damages it sustains while it is in use: moving under the power of its own engine,whether taxiing or flying. In the latter instance, you aircraft will only be insured while it is parked on the ramp or in the hangar. This coverage is less expensivebecause it presents far less exposure to the insurance company. It will only have to pay a claim if something happens to your aircraft while it is standing still and notin use. An aircraft owner may want this limited coverage when the aircraft is going to be stored and unused for a period of time.It is also possible to purchase all risk ground and flight coverage. This coverage protects you whether the aircraft is moving or not. However, a policy with thiscoverage will likely be more expensive than a policy that is either In-flight/In-motion or Not-in-flight/Not-in-motion.The aircraft damage coverage provides for transportation of the aircraft to and from the location at which the repairs are made, any related storage charges and theactual repair of the aircraft. However, most policies will also exclude coverage for damage sustained by your aircraft as a result of governmental seizure, resultingfrom repossession or enforcement of a lien against your aircraft or damage that is due to ordinary wear and tear, deterioration or age.Assuming the damage to your aircraft is covered, you should read your policy language to determine whether it contains any specific restrictions or requirementsrelating to processing of your claim, who performs the repairs, where they are performed and even how they are to be performed. Simply because you haveinsurance coverage, this does not mean that you have carte blanche for having your aircraft repaired.Aircraft Liability CoverageAircraft liability coverage protects you from liability or responsibility to third-persons for damages they may suffer resulting from the operation of your aircraft. Thecoverage requires that the insurance company both indemnify and defend you against such claims. Indemnification means that if you are responsible for the damageto a third-person, the insurance company will pay the third-person directly, up to the policy limits, the amount for which you are responsible.The duty to defend means that the insurance company will pay for your defense costs if you are sued by a third-person alleging that your operation of your aircraftcaused damage. The insurance company will hire an attorney, usually experience in aviation law, to represent you and defend against the claims. Given thecomplexity and cost of aviation litigation, this benefit alone can be worth a substantial amount of money and may even exceed the amount of money actually paid bythe insurance company to indemnify you.Your policy will always have a maximum limit for liability coverage that can be either sub-limit or smooth coverage. An example of sub-limit coverage is a policythat provides for $1,000,000 per occurrence and $200,000 per passenger. This does not mean that you have $1,000,000 to pay all claims.Rather, the insurance company will pay a maximum of $1,000,000 per occurrence, but will only pay each passenger up to a maximum of $200,000. Thus, for anaccident in which only one passenger is injured, the insurance companys maximum exposure is $200,000, exclusive of any amounts it spends on yourdefense.On the other hand, smooth limit coverage of $1,000,000 per occurrence will provide up to $1,000,000 of coverage regardless of the number of passengers. Thiscoverage presents a greater risk to the insurance company since it could have to pay the full policy limits even if only one person is injured. As a result, greater riskmeans that the premium for this coverage is going to be more expensive than the premium for a policy containing sub-limits.Policy DefinitionsWhen you read an aircraft insurance policy, you need to pay special attention to the definitions section. Many of the terms used in the policy have specific definitionsthat are different from a dictionary definition or common usage for that word. Examples include the definition of accident which is often defined as a sudden and unexpected event resulting in bodily injury, death or property damage. This isdifferent than the definition of accident contained in NTSB Rule 830 and is also more specific than a dictionary or common usage definition of the word.Another example is the definition of commercial operations or commercial purpose. An insurance policys definition of this term is usually different from, and insome cases may be broader than, the FAAs or IRSs definition or a dictionary definition.These are just two examples. However, remember that the aircraft insurance policy is a contract between you and the insurance company. Both you and theinsurance company agreed to the policy definitions when you paid the premium and the insurance company issued the policy. As a result, both you and the insurancecompany will be bound by those definitions.Coverage ExclusionsYour aircraft policy will also contain exclusions. Exclusions define circumstances in which the insurance company will not provide you with coverage for operation ofyour aircraft. An aircraft insurance policy usually includes both specific and general exclusions.Specific exclusions arise when you assume additional liability (e.g. you sign a contract that indemnifies or holds someone else harmless for damage they cause),damage occurs to your own property or injury occurs to members of your family. The policy may also specifically exclude coverage for your own medical expensesor for your operation of an aircraft that you do not own.Depending upon the state in which the aircraft is based, general exclusions can result in denial of coverage regardless of whether they directly caused a particularclaim. These exclusions will preclude coverage for operation of your aircraft in commercial operations (as defined by the policy, not necessarily the FAA or IRS),using your aircraft to commit unlawful acts, damage caused by war or terrorism or if your aircraft is operated by a pilot that is not named as an insured on the policyand does not meet the open pilot qualifications.Who Is CoveredAssuming no exclusions are applicable, the policy will provide coverage to each person named as an insured under the policy and to pilots who meet the open pilotrequirements. As a threshold matter, each pilot operating the aircraft, whether named insured or qualifying under the open pilot provision, will need to possess theappropriate pilot and medical certificates and meet all currency requirements for operation of your aircraft.The open pilot provision extends the coverage of your aircraft insurance policy to a pilot operating your aircraft who is not a named insured on your policy. Theprovision sets out total time, time in type and training requirements that the unnamed pilot must meet in order for the pilot to be covered under the policy. Generally,if those requirements are met and the pilot is operating your aircraft with your consent, your insurance coverage should extend to that pilot.What You Can DoThe complexities of aircraft insurance can seem daunting. But, what can you do to protect yourself? The first, and one of the most important things you can do, is toread your insurance policy. If you have questions regarding terms or coverage talk to your insurance agent or contact an aviation attorney who is familiar withaviation insurance matters.Once you understand the policy, make sure you abide by the policy and comply with its terms and requirements. It makes little sense to spend substantial amountsof money on insurance premiums and then place your coverage in jeopardy by doing or allowing something your policy prohibits.Next, document your operations. What do I mean by that? Simple: Keep good records. Make sure your pilot logbook is up-to-date and current. If you takeyour pilot logbook with you when you fly, make copies of the pages containing your satisfaction of the FAR currency requirements and keep the copies in a safeplace.This way, if something happens to your pilot logbook and your insurance company or the FAA later question your currency, you will have back-up proof that youwere current for your flight. Although not as critical, you may also want to keep a photocopy of your pilot certificate(s) along with your logbook records.Finally, you should use this same procedure for your aircraft and engine logbooks. If you must take them with you in the airplane, make copies and keep them in asafe place. In this instance, you may want to make a full set of copies of the logbook entries, rather than just the pages showing the aircrafts current airworthiness. An aircraft that contains logbook entries for all of the work ever performed on the aircraft is worth more to a potential purchaser than if those records are incompleteor missing.These simple steps can prevent potentially costly disputes down the road. Its been said that the best insurance is the insurance you never have to use. That may be,but if you take these steps, you should have greater peace of mind that your insurance will be there if you need it.

Harvard’s Berkman Center blog group develops blogging tutorials

Sunday, March 27, 2005

A discussion group about weblogs, or blogs for short, that meets at Harvard University’s Berkman Center for Internet & Society last week began releasing video tutorials about how to blog using various web and software tools.

Harvard University‘s Berkman Center hosts the blogging discussion group, which has met weekly for the past two years.

After months of discussion and collaboration on the new tutorials, at Friday’s evening meeting presenters showed off some of their early video tutorials, which stream recorded audio, and previously-captured video of a computer screen, along with simultaneous live audio from a microphone.

Participants learned how similar tutorials can be constructed using free software tools such as CamStudio. Audio of the session was made available on the World Wide Web.

Shimon Rura, a local software developer, presented a recent screen-capture + voiceover flash file he had made, demonstrating how to use a bookmarklet in the Frassle blogging package. Other participants discussed video demonstrations of how to podcast, and how to use specific blogging tools such as WordPress.

There was also disussion of a recent initiative to set up a Blogging101 site for distributing and translating these instructional materials. Rebecca MacKinnon, a noted blogger and Berkman Fellow, spoke about the BloggerCorps initiative to connect non-profits who want broader exposure with local blogging enthusiasts.

The meeting was held inside the main conference room in the Berkman Center’s Cambridge offices on Massachusetts Avenue.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Harvard%27s_Berkman_Center_blog_group_develops_blogging_tutorials&oldid=435730”

Australia/2005

[edit]

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Australia/2005&oldid=804653”

Home Remedy For Loosing Weight

Home remedy for loosing weight

by

Devjeet

Home remedies are nothing but something that can cure you simply with the things and natural food items available in our kitchen closet. Home remedies are a kind of first aid therapy to the body. Something that we all can try at home and get good results. We can just forget the doctor for a while and believe in the words of our old grannies who have transferred us the simple knowledge of making safe treatment for some simple ailments sitting within the premises of our home at anytime of the day and don t need to bother the doctor for simple problems like cold, cough, gastric pain.

Home remedy for loosing weight and fighting obesity

– Drinking hot water most of the time

– Taking Ajwain or souf after every heavy meal

– Taking raw ginger five minutes before meal with water.

– Taking Aloe vera empty stomach along with honey.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTuWkLi-DKQ[/youtube]

– Avoiding too much of sugar and prefer to take jaggery .

Home remedies for little wounds and pain in the joints, Earache.

– Apply turmeric in mustard oil on wounds for healing

– Best home remedy for swelling is applying til oil boiled with ajwain, garlic, onion and little hing.

– Even for joint pains same oil can be used.

– For earache the best home remedy is to boil little garlic and onion in mustard oil and add little turmeric in that. The pain is gone within few seconds.

– For blocked nose put Almond oil in the nostrils or Cow Desi Ghee in both nostrils.

Home remedy to have normal delivery and to avoid C-section

– Pregnant female should perform butterfly exercise regularly.

– She should wear comfortable clothes

– She should drink milk regularly

– In last 2 months she should start with little mixture of dry coconut ,mashed almonds and cashew nuts and dates with little ghee in milk every night. This helps in easy delivery.

– To avoid stretch marks on abdomen one should apply coconut oil or desi ghee regularly.

– Drink kesar in milk to have good complexion of the baby.

– Boil satavari roots in milk to have healthy baby.

Read about

Home Remedies

, also read about

Natural Remedies

and

Natural Products

.

Article Source:

ArticleRich.com

Steve Kubby, co-author of California Proposition 215, grows dangerously ill in US custody

Tuesday, January 31, 2006

Steve Kubby who was facing extradition from Canada, returned to California, was arrested, and is now in custody in Placer County, California Jail, pending a hearing today. He is a medical cannabis patient who relies on the drug to regulate the symptoms of malignant phenochromocytoma, a cancer of the adrenal gland which can cause the level of adrenaline in his system to fluctuate out of control. If left unregulated, this can result in sudden, fatal heart attack, stroke, pneumonia, and a variety of other conditions.

Kubby was arrested on arrival at San Francisco International Airport Thursday night on behalf of the Placer County Sheriff’s Department, having exhausted his extradition appeals in Canada. He was taken to San Mateo County Jail, pending transport to Placer County Jail. While at San Mateo County Jail, he was reportedly denied access to medication and sufficient bedding. On arrival at Placer County Jail, his blood pressure was dangerously high, and so was given Marinol, a THC synthetic.

Communication with Kubby is highly restricted. According to his wife, Michele, Kubby has been placed in solitary confinement, denied access several times to sufficient bedding to keep him warm, and denied access to the cannabis which, according to several experts on his universally fatal condition, has been solely responsible for keeping him alive for decades. The Marinol he is being given partially mitigates his symptoms, but does not completely control them. He now grows dangerously ill.

In particular, he relates how he was ordered by prison medical staff to take beta-blockers for his blood-pressure. Due to the episodic nature of the adrenaline spikes causing the high blood-pressure, according to all of his doctors, the beta-blockers would likely kill him once the spikes dropped. In an interview by phone with journalist Pat McCartney over the weekend, Kubby reported that, for refusing the beta-blockers, he was coerced into signing a waiver absolving the prison of liability, and has since been refused all care, including even Tylenol for pain management.

Activists concerned with medical marijuana, human rights and prison reform will hold a rally at noon today in front of the Placer County Superior Courthouse, where Steve Kubby is scheduled to be arraigned on violation of probation charges.

Kubby was a co-author of California’s Compassionate Use Act of 1996, also known as Proposition 215. He fled to Canada in 2001 to escape the possibility of incarceration for an extended period without access to cannabis, a possibility which, in both his and expert medical opinion, would certainly prove fatal.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Steve_Kubby,_co-author_of_California_Proposition_215,_grows_dangerously_ill_in_US_custody&oldid=2514265”

Felipe Massa wins 2008 Belgian Grand Prix, Hamilton first to cross the finish line

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Ferrari driver Felipe Massa won the FIA Formula One 2008 ING Belgian Grand Prix at Spa-Francorchamps Circuit, Spa, Belgium.

McLaren Mercedes driver Lewis Hamilton lead the race from pole for a few laps before he spun backwards and allowed Kimi Räikkönen‘s Ferrari to pass him. Kimi maintain the lead throughout the race until the rain fell onto the track on the final laps. The series of errors was finalized by Räikkönen, who spun off the track. This led Hamilton to a chequered flag, but then, after the race, he was penalized by 25 seconds for the incident with Räikkönen. Hamilton moved to third in the final standings.

McLaren filed a formal complaint with the Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile (FIA) Court of Appeal on Tuesday.

“We hereby confirm we have lodged notice of appeal,” McLaren’s CEO Martin Whitmarsh, told the BBC.

Nick Heidfeld thus took second place for BMW Sauber ahead of Hamilton.

Fernando Alonso came in fourth for Renault while his teammate Nelson Piquet Jr. spun off into the wall on the fourteenth lap, ending his race.

Both Sebastians, Vettel and Bourdais, did well for Toro Rosso finishing fifth and seventh from the tenth and ninth places on the starting grid respectfully. They were split by Robert Kubica (BMW), who finished sixth.

Mark Webber closed out the top eight for Red Bull-Renault.

Ferrari now leads the Championship with 12 points ahead of McLaren. Still, Lewis Hamilton retains the lead for McLaren in the drivers standings with 76 points, 2 points ahead of Felipe Massa.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Felipe_Massa_wins_2008_Belgian_Grand_Prix,_Hamilton_first_to_cross_the_finish_line&oldid=2478838”

Holding On With Lou Gehrig S Optimism: Making Life More Manageable For Als Patients

Holding on with Lou Gehrig s Optimism: Making Life More Manageable for ALS Patients

by

Cynthia Bennett

Lou Gehrig s spirit couldn t be doused even when dealing with a devastating disease like ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis). This debilitating and fatal disease hit Lou Gehrig after years of sterling performance and a string of record-breaking in the field of American baseball along the way sustaining several injuries and traumas to various parts of the body including the head and back. Sadly, Lou Gehrig s career ended with an abrupt decline in performance as the symptoms of ALS began manifesting as he clumsily fumbled with the baseball and slipped while running bases movements that have become second nature to him for so many years. The worsening of these symptoms was what prompted Lou Gehrig s wife Eleanor to seek medical attention to explain her husband s unexplained loss of strength and motor functioning. It was after a battery of tests that she learned about her husband s grim prognosis of the possibility of paralysis and consequently death within a period of three years.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GSahAm3l5c[/youtube]

ALS eventually became known as Lou Gehrig s disease. Even with his predicament, Gehrig remained steadfast and strong, sans any depression or pessimism, declaring during his retirement his intention to hold on as long as possible and to accept the inevitable when it comes, hoping for the best. Gehrig continued to live a productive life after retirement despite his worsening condition, even taking on the post of New York City Parole Commissioner only months after being diagnosed with ALS. As his motor neuron disease started claiming his body with paralysis setting in, his wife continued to assist him in performing whatever he needs to do until the time when it was entirely impossible for him to physically continue working. Soon after, Gehrig succumbed to the disease and passed away nearly two years after his ALS diagnosis.

Lou Gehrig s disease is difficult to deal with while normal motor functions deteriorate, mental functions remain the same, leaving the mind to be fully aware of what is happening right through the end. While others would think of this as a grueling ordeal, Gehrig remained optimistic through his ailment and used his mental faculties for as long as he could rather than to simply wallow in his physical disability. Life with ALS need not be as depressing nor should it be as short as Lou Gehrig s other patients with Lou Gehrig s disease are actually able to preserve their muscle function longer and some are able to outlive their life expectancy at diagnosis. While Lou Gehrig s physical condition might not be enough to sustain him, his mental functions were enough to let him enjoy the time he had left to live, maximizing whatever opportunities available to him both in his personal life and in his professional life.

One or two patients out of 100,000 people are diagnosed with Lou Gehrig s disease every year. Most of these people are prescribed with medication and recommended for physical and occupational therapies to manage the symptoms of ALS. These treatments have been found to help prolong the lives of people with ALS and delay the progression of the debilitating effects of the disease. ALS advocacy groups and organizations like the Often Awesome Army have cropped up over the years aiming to give the best possible care for people with ALS and to help further studies into the disease and its possible cures. In the absence of any real cure to prevent death in the years after an ALS diagnosis, what matters most is that the ALS patient is able to live his final years with the best quality possible to quote Lou Gehrig in his retirement speech I might have been given a bad break, but I ve got an awful lot to live for. For more information visit us www.army.oftenawesome.org

Cynthia Bennett works with ALS patients to help with as many of the difficulties of life with ALS as possible.

Article Source:

ArticleRich.com